Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elemental Drake (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page except signature updates.  

The result was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Elemental Drake (Dungeons &amp; Dragons)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable Dungeons & Dragons monster appearing in one supplement. Already mentioned in passing at Dragon (Dungeons & Dragons). No evidence of any third party coverage. J Milburn (talk) 15:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Trim and Merge to Dragon (Dungeons & Dragons) Web Warlock (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - non notable. shadzar|Talk|contribs 18:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — non-notable. Mention in a list. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is already mentioned in a list of dragons that we have- probably all that is needed. J Milburn (talk) 19:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 08:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable fictional creature with no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside D&D canon. This article fails WP:NOT as the primary source is a gameguide, and the descriptions fail WP:NOT and WP:WAF as well, so there is no benefit from keeping this fancruft.--Gavin Collins (talk) 09:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.