Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elements Undergraduate Research Journal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Elements Undergraduate Research Journal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Because, this article appears unable to meet notability requirements per WP:NJournals then it should have references that appear in reliable third-party publications. It does not, and does not appear to be noteworthy, and may not have significant coverage per WP:GNG --Steve Quinn (talk) 05:03, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: All the content in this article written on December 31, 2009, the day of this article's creation.  It appears that the article has not been touched since, except for maintenance tags, and maybe categorization. The notabiltiy tag was placed on the article on that same day, (December 31). On the creator's talk page there is a section which pertains to a speedy deletion request for this article on December 31, 2009  .  However,  I don't see it in the article's edit history. In any case, if it was requested for speedy delete there has been no improvement since. I believe a PROD tag would have had no impact, as well.  Steve Quinn (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The article was speedied (see here), but recreated within minutes and nobody apparently noticed...


 * Delete Purely local student journal, does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals), let alone WP:GNG. --Crusio (talk) 06:53, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, all sources are in-house, and while this is not the most damning of evidence, this, coupled with the fact that this is an undergrad publication used to showcase stuff makes it deletable. I haven't search for indexing, but I can't see why that journal would be indexed. So delete per this and per crusio and per nom. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, typical in-house university publication. Abductive  (reasoning) 09:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.