Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Rykova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:59, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Elena Rykova

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:COMPOSER look like this is a case of WP:TOOSOON the sources are too weak. A couple of interviews a coiple of shorlisting for prizes she didn't win. The prize she won as a young composer is not enough to pass nor her placing as a finalist in the Kandinsky prize "Young Artist. Project of the Year" these are excluded in #4 of the criteria Dom from Paris (talk) 23:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I've made a number of improvements to the article, adding significant accomplishments. Does this help, Domdeparis? --Hroche83 (talk) 09:42, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 23:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 23:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:33, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 00:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:COMPOSER, possibly WP:TOOSOON, she's young and actively self-promotes on social media (something creative professionals pretty much have to do,) but searches turn up social media, not WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not seeing reliable independent WP:SECONDARY sources that talk about her. Most of the refs are just advertisements for performances and other stuff that is more WP:PROMO and WP:USERG.  I welcome the creator to identify refs that are clearly independent and secondary that are not of this nature.  --David Tornheim (talk) 20:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.