Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elestor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Elestor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable magazine. No sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMAG. Mediran talk to me! 10:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This AfD has directly replaced a Prod notice ("No evidence that this magazine meets the WP:NMAG notability guidelines") that had not been contested and still had 5 days to run. I'm not sure why, but anyway, as per my earlier Prod rationale, I see no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 10:55, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  21:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  21:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  21:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Searched Google.com / Google.kr / newspaper databases - nothing of note (mostly just primary source in Korean language at the magazine website). There is no kr.wikipedia article for it. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.