Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleusinian Mysteries Solved?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  21:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Eleusinian Mysteries Solved?
Clearly WP:OR, though competent (doesn't seem crackpotty, at least at first sight.) Author could certainly contribute greatly to Eleusinian Mysteries, which already exists, but I don't think a redirect from this rather unencyclopedic title would make much sense. A previous version of the article now submitted has already been published in what seems to be a reputable outlet, so it could very well be used as a reference. Author is newcomer, so please don't bite; I've contacted him on his talk page. Lukas 20:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOT a publisher of original thought -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 20:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research, as proved by the last line: "The first version of this article was published in Rätsch, Christian & Baker, John R. (Eds.): Jahrbuch für Ethnomedizin und Bewußtseinsforschung. Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung, No 3, Berlin 1994".  (aeropagitica)   21:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as makeup. Latinus 21:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. PJM 21:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Either Original Research or Hoax Avi 21:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-24 03:21Z 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.