Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elevator Love Letter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Heart (Stars album). two reslista nd no clear consensus except that its probably not independantly notable. I'm gouing for a redirect as the elast harmful outcome. Spartaz Humbug! 19:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Elevator Love Letter

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable single, should be included in main band article Frmatt (talk) 04:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Note: Has been nominated twice today, with similar content and comment. Deleted the duplicate per WP:BOLD. --Pgallert (talk) 09:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JBsupreme (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  14:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I don't know enough about the AfD process to vote either way, but I think it's important to note that this is arguably Stars' most popular single, and that it's received significant airtime on college/indie radio stations. Of course, the article itself is poorly written, as it really just amounts to someone's thoughts on what the lyrics mean. I personally think the article could benefit from a lot more stats, and info on why this single was critical to Stars' success. However, if everyone feels it would be more appropriate in the album page, then that's fine too. Just thought I'd give my two cents.  Tom ™(2¢) 22:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: According to WP:NSONG "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." While I understand the desire to list it because it was a huge growing point in their popularity, it doesn't meet the notability standards. Frmatt (talk) 04:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge and redirect to Heart (Stars album) per notability issues. Rlendog (talk) 14:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.