Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elevator photography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete by  at 14:06, 16 September 2010 per G7. NAC Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  20:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Elevator photography

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable hobby. 50 users on youtube is not "big". Derild 49  21  ☼  01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, unsourced, possible A1 speedy. Hairhorn (talk) 01:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim to notability. Contradictory as well. Something with 50 members is not a :*"sensation" or "big."Borock (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete First article by a new contributor, welcome to Wikipedia. Safer and more sensible than elevator surfing, but until sources are found to show that this phenomenon has been noticed by the news media, it won't be able to meet even the general notability guidelines.  A Wikipedia article doesn't create notability, it only reports it. Mandsford 14:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not for what is made up in one day. Linda Olive (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

When is it going to be deleted? (I am the author, and am for deleting it to.) Airplanegod (talk) 23:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not for things made up one day and the lack of reliable sources to establish notability. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  11:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - seems to be here to advertise this alleged hobby. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * After seven days unless the articles fits WP:CSD. Derild  49  21  ☼  23:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * G7; sole author's request. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.