Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleven Eleven (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) buidhe 05:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Eleven Eleven (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film, showed at minor film festivals but did not get significant coverage by independent coverage, not enough to merit a stand-alone article, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 17:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC) *Keep. The sources look notable enough to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janitor Joseph (talk • contribs) 16:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep for now, the sources look reliable. Captain Galaxy (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , the reason I brought this to AFD is not because of unreliable sources (although I do see a blog there now which is not reliable). My concern is that the sources that talk about the film are primary sources or trivial listings, neither of which speak to the notability of the film. Per WP:GNG: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or list." The sources in this article, in my view, do not speak to the significant coverage or the independence of the subject. Do you believe these sources do? Or are there sources that I have missed that do? BOVINEBOY 2008 19:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I do believe this is significant coverage. Captain Galaxy (talk) 20:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.