Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleventyseven (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete This is the ninth time this article (in some form or another) has been deleted. I would strongly recommend that notability has been firmly established before it is recreated. &mdash; Caknuck 00:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Eleventyseven
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to meet minimum criteria of WP:MUSIC, in particular "subject of multiple non-trivial published works". The matter of being listed on a "national music chart" is up for debate; it has charted on ChristianRock.Net weekly top 30. Article was previously AFD-deleted when it was in substantially shorter form; it was tagged for speedy deletion as a re-post, but I dispute that it was a re-post due to expanded content. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep The band appears to meet WP:MUSIC, as they have had spin on Christian radio as well as major internet radio stations. &mdash;Alex43223T 02:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: Does not meet WP:MUSIC - does not have multiple WP:RS coverage, only has one album, and being listed on ChristianRock.net is not a national music chart (which in the case of the US would be Billboard, or similar). I also don't feel that ChristianRock.net qualifies as a "major radio network." Leuko 03:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, has not charted on a major chart (Billboard and Mediabase 24/7 seem to be pretty much the only two "major" US charts these days). No other criterion of WP:MUSIC is met -- at least not yet. Once that second album is released, they would meet the criterion of having multiple albums on a notable label (Flicker Records, a division of Sony BMG), but as of July 2007, these guys still fall short. Shame, too, because they have a cool name. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 04:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Barely passes notability, and the case seems to be improving by the day. Realkyhick 18:26, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, so very close. I somewhat agree with TPH above that their lack of the second album keeps them below the bar on WP:MUSIC; I also had problems tracking down reliable sources - but, Christian bands are very difficult to find RS for to start with, for some reason. I also suspect that Christian recordings don't tend to hit Billboard very often, which makes chart info difficult. I think waiting for the next album to drop would be the best course. Delete for now, with no barriers to recreation later. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I speedied an earlier version that contained no assertion of notability; here the assertion does not pass WP:MUSIC. If we just want to let any ole' band have an article, then let's but until we collectively decide to do that, we're left with the guidelines at WP:MUSIC. ChristianRock.net is not a major radio network. Contrary to Tony, I don't think that Christian bands are harder to find RSes for, we have hundreds of bands/musicians categorized at Category:Performers of Christian music and its subcats and hundreds more at Category:Christian musical groups and its subcats, they just tend to not be notable - like Polka bands, barbershop quartets, a cappella groups doing Gregorian Chants that don't chart.  WP is not a measure of the quality of the group or its music, it's limited to the notability of the group or its music. Carlossuarez46 04:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete still doesn't pass Will (talk) 07:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.