Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elfhelm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Elfhelm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not sufficiently notable fictional character. "Elfhelm" has a bunch of Google scholar hits, but all but two are either for an ancient Briton or a different, apparently unrelated, fictional character. Of the two sources I could find, one is a list of names titled "Spell Checking the Lord of the Rings" (not in-depth) and the other source doesn't appear to be enough to pass WP:GNG. Hog Farm (talk) 22:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A very minor character — with a common name!--Jack Upland (talk) 00:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Another piece of fancruft that is already better covered at https://lotr.fandom.com/wiki/Elfhelm . Keeping such articles here just does a disservice to our readers. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete ot every character in an epic romance is notable. At least not one written in the last 500 years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to War of the Ring, where the character is mentioned in context. The name is a plausible search term and redirects are cheap. -- 23:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG. Belongs on fandom.Kacper IV (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another piece of fancruft Wm335td (talk) 17:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.