Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elgi Equipments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Please mind the below comments before restoring the article. czar 02:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Elgi Equipments

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article about company that does not satisfy corporate notability. If this were in draft space, it would be declined as being about what the company says about itself, and not about what third parties say about the company. It has been moved into draft space twice, and has been moved back into article space by the author twice. Author has not addressed the question of whether they are being paid or any other conflict of interest. Nominating for a full deletion discussion as an alternative to speedy deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep Publicly traded company in India, almost certainly notable (see WP:PUBLIC WP:LISTED) and almost certainly has significant coverage in independent sources. Did nominator perform a WP:BEFORE search for them? UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe you're referring to WP:LISTED not WP:PUBLIC. In any case, it doesn't guarantee automatic notability. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case Praxidicae (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - User:Dankeshankar - Are you requesting that the article be draftified as an alternative to deletion, which is what User:Theroadislong and User:Scope creep had done earlier? The banner on an article that is tagged for deletion states that it should not be moved while deletion is being discussed.  A conclusion to draftify is acceptable to me if that is what you are asking.  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Hey guys, sorry to respond late, I am still figuring out how to respond on Wikipedia. I've noted the article has been sent for speedy deletion twice. Yes, I moved the article into draft space because after getting a suggestion from Admins Praxidae and Robert, I felt like there might be changes. But I have mentioned all third party sources and have tried to change as much as I can. So, as of my affiliation. I've no ties with the company nor I am getting paid to do this. I would like to understand the specifics than getting vague answers on why it's on deletion always. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankeshankar (talk • contribs) 04:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Robert McClenonPraxidicae Please provide me with information on how to clean up the article and make it 'encyclopedic'. I am still unable to figure out what's wrong and your expertise might help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankeshankar (talk • contribs) 04:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Robert McClenon Can you just put it under the draft, so I can change it to a much better and acceptable version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankeshankar (talk • contribs) 08:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 04:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify- as requested by author. Any COIs from significant contributors should be disclosed prior to submission. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 08:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify as requested, hopefully references can be found.  HighKing++ 21:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.