Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ElgooG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 19:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

elgooG
The idea for elgooG is a cute one, but I'm afraid it does not pass WP:WEB and thus should be deleted. RFerreira (talk) 21:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep because of this. At least one news source indicates that elgooG got a surge in traffic after China banned Google. If that ain't notable, I don't know what is. Ten Pound Hammer Farfel  and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 23:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * remmaH rep peeK The surge in China as a way to end-around censorship would make it notable. Eauhomme (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep for its role in 2002. Hopefully, the rotartsinimdA will understand Eauhomme's message.  Mandsford (talk) 11:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Question Does this website actually exist? I cannot find an active link for it.  RFerreira (talk) 17:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Try Eauhomme (talk) 01:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.