Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eli Lishinsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Eli Lishinsky

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Article on a music producer that may not meet WP:BLP. I checked GNews for this name, but it has turned up empty; GBooks only brings up an unrelated (?) match in a jazz periodical. A profile at Discogs is about as close as it gets here. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  —Joe407 (talk) 19:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, just a simple Google search validates and shows that the subject is WP:NOTABLE and WP:V in the fields described in the article, i.e Jewish music, so looking in the wrong places on the G planet will not help, just someone needs to help out improving the article (a good idea would be to ask for help at WP:TALKJUDAISM) and goodness, the article was created on 27 October 2010, not even one week ago, by an obviously very new user so that this whole nomination is unjust and rushed and is itself in violation of WP:BITE. The nominator is requested to note Give an article a chance: "Don't be too hasty in nominating newly-created articles for deletion" and Don't demolish the house while it's still being built: "An article too short to provide more than rudimentary information about a subject should be marked as a stub and edited, and expanded, rather than simply deleted." Thank you, IZAK (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice rant, but the Google Search absolutely does not establish notability. All of those results are from lyrics sites, obviously not reliable. Please provide some links that show significant coverage of Lishinsky in reliable sources.  Goodvac   ( talk ) 09:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete IZAK - I understand your concern regarding DONTDEMOLISH. I would add that looking at the edits for the user who created the article, it looks like a (self) promotional piece.  It is the users only article and the only other edits by that user are links to the Lishinsky article.


 * Regarding notability, the search results you point to, many are promotional (from production companies pushing albums or concerts such as teemproductions.com), many are from the same source ("Mixing and post-production work has been keeping the maestro Eli Lishinsky real busy." is a phrase used word-for-word on many sites), and many simply list his name as a producer. Take a look at the criterion for notability of a musician as I'm unsure he qualifies. Joe407 (talk) 04:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep, for reasons I have cited above. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 05:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Vote struck; editor already voted above.  Goodvac   ( talk ) 09:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:BIO, as the nominator said. No significant coverage in reliable sources.  Goodvac   ( talk ) 09:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.