Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eli Nacht


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Eli Nacht

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails to meet the relevant notability guideline The person is of no interest for Wikipedia cause of lack of achievements that has influenced on Israel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitaskim (talk • contribs) 09:38, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) 	No any prove of being strategic adviser to Yisrael Beiteinu
 * 2) 	Adviser to a deputy speaker of the Knesset in Israel means one of two assistant of member of parliament. Assistant has no real power and/or influence but to fulfill the order of the boss.
 * 3) 	Book Breaking Stereotypes – one of the thousand books that are published in Israel annually. The book is a matter of interest neither for science nor political
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. He clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. He looks more like staffer and lobbyist, then public servant, hence failing the notability guidelines. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete-- Jac 16888 Talk 19:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.