Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliane Chappuis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Eliane_Chappuis
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Person isn't notable and nor are some of the bits of info about her; poorly written; no links to the references all of which are primary sources TimothyJacobson (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 October 12.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  17:13, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Apologies; my first time nominating an article for deletion--TimothyJacobson (talk) 19:06, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:31, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Is a Daily Mirror article about her not good enough?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You need more than one source: see Notability for the tedious details. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I know, but there were two. Now I added one more reliable source.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, the Daily Mirror article is reliable and substantial, and it is possible to find out more about her, see the list of articles about her (copied from her official website), for example this article published by Berner Zeitung. The article has potential, subject meets WP:GNG and WP:ACTOR. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Vejvančický. TBrandley 23:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.