Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eline Koster (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Eline Koster
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 01:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Netherlands. Joeykai (talk) 01:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Article has been expanded, also with sources which establish notability per WP:GNG. Best coverage is the feature article about Eline Koster when she retired from her career, which appeared in AD (aka Algemeen Dagblad, a national newspaper published in Rotterdam), and this article about her in Vlietnieuws, a regional newspaper. Cielquiparle (talk) 03:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - The vlietnieuws article is identical to an article in the ADO Post which isn't independent of Koster. Dougal18 (talk) 10:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * In that case the second strongest article is this 2015 feature article in a local newspaper (p. 33). Cielquiparle (talk) 16:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Cielquiparle and WP:HEY. Besides the sources above, I also found, , , , and , among many more Dutch sources. Young player with ongoing career in women's Eredivisie which receives decent amount of media coverage. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - the two feature articles mentioned by Cielquiparle are enough for GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets the WP:GNG per sources identified. Why do we still nominate female sportspeople under false pretenses? gidonb (talk) 02:07, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article passes WP:GNG per source analysis by Cielquiparle. Jogurney (talk) 14:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 20:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. It's snowing! gidonb (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.