Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elinor Burns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 08:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Elinor Burns

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources do not seem to be related to the same subject, subject is not notable, and sources appear to be self-published. JAH2k (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:23, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 15:23, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 15:23, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 15:23, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. I don’t understand this nomination. The article has multiple sources to demonstrate notability. Has the nomination checked the offline refs to support the statement that the sources don’t relate to the subject? Mccapra (talk) 16:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added to the article. Also found several reviews of her writing. I think there is enough coverage. I'm not sure which sources the nominator says don't refer to the same person. Tacyarg (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Perfectly fine minor figure from British labour and communist movements. Sources are provided, and check out so far as I have access. Rupert Clayton (talk) 06:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely pass WP:POLITICIAN, WP:BIO, etc.-- P A T H S L O P U   ( T A L K ) 08:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, I've further expanded the article, there are plenty of reliable sources with significant coverage of her, and there's no question that they do refer to the same person. Warofdreams talk 10:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Certainly after the expansion this figure seems encyclopedic. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:43, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.