Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisa Jordana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of The Howard Stern Show staff.  MBisanz  talk 00:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Elisa Jordana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Simply reading this article will show you why the it was nominated for deletion. Woods01 (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - This discussion page was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now -- I offer no opinion on the nomination at this time.  -- Finngall   talk  04:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Exactly and none of this suggests better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Sir Joseph (talk) 05:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment What is everyone voting on discussing? The nominator, didn't say why this article was nominated. "I don't like it" isn't a reason to delete. I'd like to note that the article was vetted through the Articles for Creation process. Also, the subject appears to pass GNG. I think the nominator and those who voted delete, such as, please say why you vote delete. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not known outside (and hardly inside) the Stern Show universe. Thechased (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete . Redirect to List of The Howard Stern Show staff. Thank you User:Finngall for finding this process and making it possible to discuss this subject. User:Megalibrarygirl is correct this was a defective nomination with no apparent WP:BEFORE. She's also quite correct that, given the defective nom, contributors to this process should feel obliged to give reasons for their assertion based on policy and sourcing. For my part, I'm not overly impressed with the sourcing to date. The MTV and Classicalite links seem to meet RS, but to my eye they appear to be routine entertainment news. Based on a reasonable search, the subject doesn't seem to meet WP:BASIC or WP:ENTERTAINER, at least not sufficiently for a BLP. I'd be willing to re-evaluate if better sources are shown. BusterD (talk) 03:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, for the thoughtful response! I'm on the fence myself. The MTV sources seem good, especially since they are primarily about her. However, the other sources don't lend to her passing GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I took a second longer look, and I'm not seeing anything else. Using Newspapers.com, I did find one Asbury Park newspaper article which covers some of her 2008 cavorting (behind an additional paywall that even my own normal account can't access), but IMHO there's just not enough upon which to base a BLP. The Maddow transcript doesn't even mention the subject's name; the classicalite link is way tabloid. Aside from the MTV links which do directly detail the subject, I don't think there's enough to meet notability. The most inclusive thing I would agree to at this time is redirect or merge to List of The Howard Stern Show staff. Changing my assertion above; redirects are cheap. If the outcome of this process is that the article is deleted, I will redirect myself. BusterD (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.