Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisa Jordana (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  08:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Reclosing as No Consensus, per Deletion review/Log/2017 January 3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoySmith (talk • contribs) 00:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Elisa Jordana
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The AFD in February began with a majority for delete, but was closed as redirect to List of The Howard Stern Show staff. Since then, she's had a minor role in Sharknado: The 4th Awakens, and last month another editor re-created over the redirect. Now for my money, one Sharknado does not a summer make, and the newly-recreated article reads like a straight paste from a press release for her. Still, reverting to the redirect without a discussion doesn't quite seem to be in the spirit of the relevant policies, so I've taken it back to AFD. Not notable per WP:MUSICBIO outside of her association with one band; not notable per WP:NACTOR; has written some blogs, but the WaPo reference only mentions her in passing, so not notable per WP:AUTHOR. Her sole claim to fame seems to be her previous work on the Howard Stern show, for which she hasn't received much coverage in WP:RS outside of the shout-out on Jimmy Kimmel. Wikishovel (talk) 01:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 01:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 01:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 01:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep The movie role and the improved sourcing put this article over the edge of the notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect The sourcing is not very convincing, as many sources do not comply to WP:RS. The acting job is uncredited and only mentioned under "Rest of cast listed alphabetically". The Banner talk 18:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I say delete for sure. Not only is the sourcing not convincing, but a lot of it isn't even sourced. The source for her attending the Connecticut School of Broadcasting doesn't even mention her.TBMNY (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep She has a lot of detractors who don't like her but she was apart of a very popular band, a regular guest and writer for the most famous Radio Show in history, had a movie role, written for many popular websites, and is verified on Twitter. More than enough to warrant a Wikipedia Page IMO. LeafK1 (talk) 1:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * LeafK1, judging by your edit history, your opinion is incredibly bias. It honestly seems like the people who are editing this page are either Elisa Jordana herself, or people who knows her. It all looks super suspect.TBMNY (talk) 18:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 23:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, without prejudice to relisting in the future if her career does not progress further. All of her achievements alone would not qualify her; Being a member of Cobra Starship doesn't qualify her for her own article (see Matty Healy from The 1975, for example, who was deleted despite being relatively high-profile), nor does the minor acting role or the radio appearances. When combined, though, I think she just sneaks in as an admittedly Z-list public figure, and as such we should have an article. KaisaL (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.