Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisabeth Hille


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Elisabeth Hille

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN personality. Didn't even make it to the final round of a tournament Travelbird (talk) 01:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Made it to 11 out of 6,978 contestants. That's pretty good. She is also tied for the record for highest earnings by a female at the main event There was also buzz around her as she was one of the best performing women in the tournament making it so far and almost making the final table. UpendraSamaranayake (talk) 06:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BIO and WP:GNG. We don't document 'pretty good', we document notability, which this person lacks. § FreeRangeFrog 01:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * By 'pretty good' I mean notable. She has the record for highest winnings at main table for a girl with Gaelle. UpendraSamaranayake (talk) 17:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This person's claim to notability seems entirely tied to the 2012 WSOP Main Event. I guess I would not be opposed to a redirect to 2012 World Series of Poker, where she is mentioned, but I'm not seeing enough to warrant an individual article at this time.  Gongshow  Talk 05:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, she's not retired. She'll play future tournaments. UpendraSamaranayake (talk) 17:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * True. And if she becomes notable for something else in the WP:Future, then I would support an article at that time.  Gongshow  Talk 22:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - per Gongshow, not yet notable. There don't seem to be formal Wikipedia guidelines on notability yet for poker professionals, but there's an essay at WP:WikiProject Poker which looks like a good start, and she doesn't seem to fit the consensus of notability defined there. Altered Walter (talk) 21:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, same reasons as above. Echoing what I've said on the talk page, I also have to question why Hille is being argued for before Gaelle Bauman has an article. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 10:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.