Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisabeth Hughes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 10:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Elisabeth Hughes

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article lacks Attribution to Verify, WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria. Not to mention that this was a contested PROD proposal back in June and I do agree with this reasoning for deletion as nothing have been done since then to rectify that. Jay Pegg (talk) 04:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--I don't see any notability in the article, and have been unable to establish notability via a search of the news. Drmies (talk) 05:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Substantial number of hits on Autism support sites, also with variant "Elizabeth." Appears "notable in field." Collect (talk) 14:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * comment: Of the 290 ghits, most of these are of a promotional nature and some are unrelated to the subject. Jay Pegg (talk) 08:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Raven1977 Talk to me My edits  08:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I can unfortunately find neither library holdings nor reviews of her books. DGG (talk) 09:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.