Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elise window seal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete as a blatant copyright violation. Hut 8.5 16:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Elise window seal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. No salvagable encyclopaedic content. nancy (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: I was going to list this one too; this original how-to article does not belong in an encyclopedia. I feel like a tourist (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: original research: describes author's how they did it. Mukadderat (talk) 19:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Note to the author: Wikipedia is neither an instruction manual nor your blog.   Anturiaethwr  Talk  19:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: per above. Nothing encyclopedic worth saving. nneonneo talk 19:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously unencyclopedic WP:NOT – Zedla (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G12 as a copyvio of this forum site. -FrankTobia (talk) 03:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Mr. Cut and Ms. Paste have visited a forum (see above), the text (and photo links, all broken) lifted and deposited here. If it weren't for the copyvio, I'd still urge a delete as Wikipedia is not a "how-to" guide. B.Wind (talk) 04:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.