Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisha Krauss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Barely any participation from other editors with one keep !vote against the nomination. Two re-lists and over 3 weeks at AfD, a third re-list wouldn't benefit this discussion so I'm closing this as no consensus. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 16:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Elisha Krauss

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is not notable. No notable sources for the subject. Fails WP:NOT Coderzombie (talk) 08:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, Nom appears not to have followed WP:BEFORE. Article created by SPA linked with SPA who just reeated The Daily Wire, however, a quick google news search on Kraus turns up significant coverage of her and of her career  from which a substantive article can be created.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Very few neutral sources in the search. Most of these are her own profiles such as linkedin, facebook, twitter, soundcloud. And even among the other results, not WP:RS Coderzombie (talk) 05:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.