Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisheva Federman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 14:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Elisheva Federman
The article Elisheva Federman contains a picture from an unknown source, an introduction with virtually no information (the wife of... continues to be active) and an interview from the Israeli daily Maariv. The inclusion of the interview in Wikipedia and perhaps also the picture seems to be a serious breach of copyright law. I suggest deleting the entire article. gidonb 23:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I've removed the interview, which certainly isn't fair use here. This leaves a three-sentence substub that may or may be deleteworthy; I have no opinion on the matter.  If kept, the article's history will need to be deleted to remove the copyvio, which extends back to the first revision.  Please don't just say "remit to WP:CP", though.  (This afd nomination was orphaned.  Listing now.  Etc etc.) &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 15:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Hello Criptic, thank you for removing the interview. Can you explain what you mean with everything from Please... (or better still list/unlist yourself). I am not so experienced with all these procedures. I wish to continue the deletion proposal. Even her demographics are missing. Articles should be in one's own right, at least to a minimal extent. gidonb 15:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I said "Please don't just say 'remit to WP:CP'" to try to forstall people saying "delete as copyvio" to get rid of the interview, while ignoring the stub (which is a separate issue). And the listing has already been done, both at Copyright problems and Articles for deletion. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I assume I do not have to do anything (not that I intended to), just wait for others to vote. Of course, if someone really changes these lines into a stub, I will change my vote. gidonb 18:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons in the introduction. gidonb 18:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Noam Federman. Ξxtreme Unction |yakkity yak 14:17, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Not notable enough for me. Only one mention (as an aside) on Google news.  Happy to change if more evidence provided, but for now Redirect to Noam Federman. -  brenneman (t) (c)  14:19, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.