Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elite Indoor Football


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus seems pretty clear. Drmies (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Elite Indoor Football

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears non-notable per WP:GNG (currently unsourced because it is new, however, even a search of news sources turns up three mentions mostly about the Cape Fear Heroes playing a game against the Steam – "played the Savannah Steam of the EIF..."). There is not even any WP:ROUTINE coverage (something that is not enough to GNG and typically only proves existence) of this and despite having already played one season, no scores or records were ever recorded or reported in the news. Not to mention, the games I did find reported on their self-published social media platforms, for an "indoor" football league all but two games were played outdoors and the other two (maybe up to four, hard to tell which were actually played) were in the unnamed converted warehouse. As of right now, this is still WP:TOOSOON for notability here. Yosemiter (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. No notability. oknazevad (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes notability. PXS1245 (talk) 03:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC) — PXS1245 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep 49.49.239.63 (talk) 04:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC) — 49.49.239.63 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep 👍🏻Like. Kerpioniolopschique (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC) — Kerpioniolopschique (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep Clearly encyclopedic. Might want to search for sources instead of just asking for it to be deleted, IMHO. Lololololollololllloolllll000000023 (talk) 04:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC) — Lololololollololllloolllll000000023 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep per consensus. Little Miss Wikipeda (talk) 04:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC) — Little Miss Wikipeda (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * And then suddenly a ton of single-posting WP:SOCKs appear with no sources for WP:V and decide on their own "consensus" with themselves. A discussion is not a vote, you can't just flood the ballot box and "win". Sources are needed. Lets start with a source that provides even a single game of coverage between two teams in the EIF (not social media, but even that is lacking). Or even one of the team's season record last year. Good luck. Yosemiter (talk) 04:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That's not how consensus works, bro! You can't just abuse the system like that! WP:NOTVOTE. 24.15.68.186 (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Is someone upset that consensus isn't going their way? No need to log out and WP:SOCK as an IP! 49.49.245.72 (talk) 03:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That is not me, I would never use the term "bro". Perhaps you should read WP:CONSENSUS. (Also my IP would start with 192. or 71.) Yosemiter (talk) 03:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep despite what the deletionist snowflakes are saying! 49.49.245.72 (talk) 03:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously notable. Go out and search 4 sources instead of complaining that there are none! Punicdana (talk) 03:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per democracy! Menessheik (talk) 03:11, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep freedom of expression. Yuleguru (talk) 03:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Arrowcotes (talk) 03:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per consensus. Sofiawrapt (talk) 03:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Hebisian (talk) 03:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * To the socks above, WP:PROVEIT. I clearly explained that I did do a search and came up with three mentions which are not sufficient for GNG. (In fact the mentions were in local articles about the Heroes, a team then in the SIF, that played the Steam. It was then mentioned that the Steam play in the EIF. That is about three degrees of separation from actually being subject matter.) Yosemiter (talk) 03:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.