Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elixir Web Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Elixir Web Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't satisfy notability. Most mentions in searches are related to directories and job portals. Author also seems to have a COI going by the username. MT Train Talk 14:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 14:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 14:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: The only reference in the article is to the company's website. Had this been in draft space, it never would have made it to mainspace. I looked around for reliable sources, and found minor passing mentions here and there, but nothing focused on the company. Google News search returns two minor hits . Failure of WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment There are some references to the company in Google Books -, although the one with the most details sounds too much like a puff piece which made me wary of voting keep. Hzh (talk) 10:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/ talk ¦ contribs \ 20:05, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Per Hzh, despite the publisher being a very reliable one in the regional circuits and that there is a cultural difference, as to the style of writing between western media and Indian ones.But, one source do not maketh notability.I admit that I am yet to run a detailed search. &#x222F; WBG converse 10:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.