Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Bonner Allen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  01:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Elizabeth Bonner Allen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was unable to de-orphan. Created by a single-purpose account. Sources seem weak and mostly about her projects and nothing about her. Parts of her bio seem lifted straight from imdb. She did win a Royal Television Society Award though. Other than that I'd say it barely scratches WP:ANYBIO &oelig; &trade; 06:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Women,  and Television. &oelig; &trade; 06:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. She seems to work as "Liz Allen" which is so common that finding sources will be tricky. There's several long reviews of Inside John Lewis in good-quality sources (incl Guardian & Independent) already in the article. I think it is possible this is a poor article on a notable subject. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * ETA: Some more reviews: Inside John Lewis in The Times (paywalled); Silverville in Guardian; Parking Mad: Guardian (the last doesn't mention her except in credits). Espresso Addict (talk) 05:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.