Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Elmore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Elizabeth Elmore

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a BLP that has had no references since being created. Elmore was in two minor, regional bands in the late 1990s/early 2000s, but there's no indication of either her or the bands meeting WP:GNG. Dgpop (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:15, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I think I can support WP:GNG based on just this current source in the article and this.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment The News Gazzete source you posted is just citing what Elmore said, making it primary source. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I found several RS that covered her significantly. I added them to the article and improved it somewhat. It's also important to note that nearly every article about Sarge or the Reputation emphasize Ellmore's contributions to the groups. She passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per comments above by Megalibrarygirl. I am perplexed by the nominator's statement that there is no indication that either of the bands meet GNG. They only need to meet GNG or NMUSIC. The Reputation is listed as a good article. Thsmi002 (talk) 12:48, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * When there are zero sources for a BLP after 13 years, that's usually a sign. Nominating this for deletion has finally resulted in a flurry of additions, so success! Dgpop (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * What happens sometimes, is that sources exist, but they're hidden behind paywalls. A lot of the info I added to the article I had to get from databases that require a subscription. So sometimes an article can languish for years and not turn up sources on an internet search because the sources are all unavailable to most people. :( Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep She certainly meets WP:GNG, with sustained, significant, independent coverage of her in reliable sources, as added by Megalibrarygirl. RebeccaGreen (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Elmore was the subject of a profile in the Los Angeles Times, as well as extended mentions in a number of WP:RS spanning a period of several years. In many cases these are more than simply ROUTINE album reviews but provide biographical information. That said, overall, the amount of biographical sourcing could be stronger and this is somewhat on the edge in my opinion. Chetsford (talk) 08:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.