Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Harrin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 00:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Elizabeth Harrin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

After removing all bad and self-sourced claims, all advertising cruft, and all puffery, the article is left with a single, unsourced sentence, which does not demonstrate significant notability. This article feels like a self-built attempt at promotion. Jorm (talk) 01:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Further, it's an orphan.--Jorm (talk) 01:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom.--Jorm (talk) 01:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment What is A Girl’s Guide to Project Management? Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , It was/is a blog? It's uncertain.  The marketing material seemed to indicate a book that could be purchased, which I expect was a combination series of blog posts. Jorm (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , I went on the site, I'm guessing it's a generic blog/course site, I vote delete. Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 02:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Meh I created this article in October 2011‎, not sure why though. She won awards from magazines but I'm not sure if any of those are notable.  Google news shows her quoted as an expert in her industry, but not much about her.  So whatever, don't really care.   D r e a m Focus  03:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and the basic tenets of WP:N. Also potential WP:COI. Dr42 (talk) 18:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * There is no conflict of interest. She was mentioned in a different AFD Articles_for_deletion/2-plan_project_management_software so I went ahead and created a stub article for her listing all of her awards that seemed potentially notable at the time.  I have nothing to do with the person at all, and don't care if the article is deleted or not.   D r e a m Focus  18:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm just surprised you still remember the process of creating the article. There are some articles I created 11 years ago or more that I had entirely forgotten I created them. This is one of the reasons I actually created 2 articles on Jack N. Gerard. The first I created was without his middle initial, back when he was head of the American Petroleum Institute, in eaither 2012 or before. I then created another article in 2018 shortly after he was called as a general authority seventy of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. So it was at least 6 years between the two article creations.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are some hits on Google News, but nothing that seems reliable/neutral/secondary (etc.). In the absence of sources, she doesn't meet WP:GNG/WP:BASIC. I don't know what SNGs to even begin to try to fit her under because of the complete lack of information. Samsmachado (talk) 01:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia needs to stop being a barely annotated guide to the internet. We should scrap all articles sources only to the subject's webpage. The really scarry thing is how many articles would be deleted if we did this.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Barely found anything about her aside from an interview. Not sure if any of the awards she won are notable. I agree with Dream Focus that there's no WP:COI involved. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.