Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Israel (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Elizabeth Israel
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'd PROD this, but there is technically a first AfD here. Despite the puffery in the article there's no evidence that this is "one of the most widely reported longevity claims in recent years", and in any event it only states that she was born, lived for some indeterminate time, and died. Once stripped of the filler material about Guinness and the GRG, there's clearly WP:NOPAGE here; the claims about her birth and death dates are best handled on a list in the Longevity claims article. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 03:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 04:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 04:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete This article fails WP:BIO1E and WP:NOPAGE. Her age claim is so outlandish that she scammed some news coverage, but she barely even qualifies to be listed in Longevity claims. Her claimed age of 128 is just that ridiculous. This WP:PERMASTUB is not needed in an encyclopedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:52, 8 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete The actions of the boosters who engaged in promoting her longevity claim might make them notable, but Israel herself is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - One of those who were known only for claiming themselves to be oldest or very old. This is similar to other few recently nominated articles. These subjects lack significant coverage especially when we take their extraordinary claims into account. Rzvas (talk) 06:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.