Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth J. Drake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Elizabeth J. Drake

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG as a failed judicial nominee. Let&#39;srun (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting in the midst of proposals and counter proposals as consensus is far from clear and each AFD in this subject area is being closed differently. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Law. Let&#39;srun (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to meet BLP1E. &mdash;siro&chi;o 01:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete & Merge content per below proposal As the article creator, delete as failing WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E. Safiel (talk) 01:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Okoslavia (talk) 06:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Washington, D.C..  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Alternative proposal: Merge all otherwise non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees into a single article along the lines of Unsuccessful Donald Trump judicial nominations. We can preserve a truncated form of the data in one place, without reaching individual notability concerns. BD2412  T 21:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I think a redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies makes more sense, seeing as there is already a description of the WP:BLP1E for this nominee and the other non-notable failed presidential judicial nominees, along with details about specific dates regarding the nomination process and why the nomination ultimately failed. As it is, the list of otherwise non-notable judicial nominees for Trump is fairly small and I don't think there is the needed SIGCOV. Let&#39;srun (talk) 15:24, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with a redirect as well. &mdash;siro&chi;o 19:11, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
 * So hold on, now we're listing expired nominations in a judicial controversy article? Why? What about Drake is/was controversial? Snickers2686 (talk) 17:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You raise a fair point. I withdraw that proposal for this article. Let&#39;srun (talk) 19:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * FYI, there was another discussion started about changing the titles of that series of articles Talk:Joe Biden judicial appointment controversies to better reflect their content and intent. &mdash;siro&chi;o 20:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I would be good with this proposal. Safiel (talk) 21:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - as per nom. Whitemancanjump23 (talk) 06:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Only a nominee but not an actual judge. LibStar (talk) 07:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.