Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth James


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Elizabeth James
Was tagged for speedy deletion by User:Tv316 as patent nonsense, which it isn't, but I judging by the comment he left on the talk page (copied below), I think he means complete bollocks.  howch e  ng   {chat} 01:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Copied from Talk:Elizabeth James: I listed this for speedy deletion. I've looked up "'Mickie James' sister" "elizabeth james wwe" "'mickie james' sister elizabeth" and a couple more, and nothing comes up. Judging by the insane stuff this guy is writing about, I'd say this person doesn't exist. tv316 22:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry about the speedy nomination. It fits better under complete bollocks. Delete per my previous comment. tv316 01:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete total vanity even if true. Ruby 01:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, GLORY Wrestling, of which she is a member, doesn't have a page, so she shouldn't either. Being a relative of someone notable does not make you notable. -- Jjjsixsix (talk)/(contribs) @ 01:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Glory Wrestling does have a page. Click on the external link to her "bio".  However, the front page of the Glory Wrestling page says, "The images and text contained on this site should not necessarily be construed as facts pertaining to the real lives of these ladies. Like actresses playing a part on TV or films, these ladies are playing their part in the world of independent wrestling.".  This is a farce.  Delete.  And what does being a valet have to do with wrestling?  The Glory Wrestling page calls all of the women on their pages wrestlers and valets.  User:Zoe|(talk) 03:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Apparently "Valets" are to female wrestling what "Managers" are to male wrestling. Jcuk 21:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Zoe. Sumahoy 03:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-24 04:20Z 
 * Delete unverifiable vanity  Dakota  ~  ε  06:59, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, either vanity or non-notable. McPhail 09:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the girl looks pretty, but otherwise quite unremarkable. Ikh (talk) 10:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I thought we kept professional sports persons? Jcuk 10:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifable vanity. --Terence Ong 11:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Extremely weak keep. At least for the time being. After a bit of research, I've found that GLORY wrestling is a notable enough phenomenon to be included here, and she does have a biography on GLORY. For that reason, I vote keep for the time being, albeit very reluctantly. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs [[Image:Flag_of_Germany.svg|25px|Germany]] 11:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable vanity, even a complex google search such as "Elizabeth James" -wikipedia ucla wrestling OR wrestler shows nothing relevant. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia  12:22 2006-01-24


 * Speedy Delete Vanity, unverifiable, and bio does not assert importance of person. --LeFlyman 23:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.