Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Jordan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1968. Snow redirect. Merging can be done from history (with proper attribution). To address Milowent's comment: redirecting is a valid outcome of AfD. While boldly doing it is always (and oft should be) an option, accusing somebody of a "useless nomination" doesn't further the collaborative goals of the project. The Bushranger One ping only 09:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Elizabeth Jordan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Can't find any sources, non notable Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1968 per precedent. Does not meet GNG as free-standing article, consensus established is that appearing as a centerfold is not of itself sufficient claim to notability to support a free-standing article.


 * Redirect fails WP:GNG & WP:PORNBIO Fasttimes68 (talk) 20:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If not kept, redirect and keep all content. Thanks for another useless nomination.--Milowent • hasspoken  01:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If you think it's useless, why bother to comment? Sorry about submitting some of these that have been nominated since the guidelines changed.  I'll be more careful to find prior AfD's in the future as I go through the next 4 decades.Fasttimes68 (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I bother to comment to stop you from wasting our time, we've had a few rounds of these mass nominations in the past. Don't waste time on AfD, none of the content is going to be deleted.  The only question is whether some folks merit an individual article or not, per one of my comments in the Lynne Austin AfD. You certainly could spend perhaps some hours doing redirects and merges and organizational improvements to playmate articles if you wish, that would be worthwhile.--Milowent • hasspoken  01:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect. While I gave this one a pass when I performed my first round of redirects, the community consensus in the later group of Playmate AFDs took a slightly more stringent line. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.