Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Kinahan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Freshacconci reevaluation of the sources Yngvadottir gave, wasn't rebutted and consensus shows she doesn't meet the criteria for ARTIST or GNG yet Secret account 05:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Elizabeth Kinahan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ARTIST. No real substantive coverage here. A handful of mentions in a local newspaper does not make one notable. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 14:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete An artist working locally, which is fine, but no evidence (either in the article or found via Google, Highbeam & Questia) that the subject meets the WP:ARTIST criteria. AllyD (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This is essentially a resume and what is there does not satisfy WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG at this time.  freshacconci  talk talk  17:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. Even with the sources added after I !voted, I don't see this passing GNG or ARTIST. The only sources that seem to be beyond the trivial are the couple of Durango Herald articles. However, on their own, those brief mentions are not enough to establish notability. This may be a case of WP:TOOSOON and I have no prejudice against rewriting this article in a few years if there's more substantial coverage.  freshacconci  talk talk  20:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't DeleteThis is a profile of an important artist in her field. There are sources from multiple credible news outlets, both in her home town and elsewhere. The entry may need to be improved upon, but it's worthy of inclusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wdebalt (talk • contribs) 19:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Extensive local coverage I believe makes her meet the general notability guideline. I've cleaned up the article, used the listed news articles to add information and to reference things, and added a reference from before she moved to Colorado. Note also the additional local press coverage listed, which does not appear to be online but should be taken into account. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:ARTIST Tiggerjay (talk) 05:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.