Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Matuschka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 12:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Elizabeth Matuschka

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable unsuccessful election candidate. Notability for reasons other than her unsuccessful candidature has not been asserted. Mattinbgn\talk 21:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Mattinbgn\talk 21:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant media coverage. Epbr123 (talk) 21:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete She may be a candidate for government, but is not notable in her own right. scope_creep (talk) 21:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Frickeg (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not asserted let alone established.Garrie 21:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Originally looked at including this within the Candidates of the Australian federal election, 2004 article; however, I felt it inappropriate as it's merely a listing. Also, electoral candidates are usually significant members of the community they're standing to represent. Would be happy for it to be merged into or form the basis for a Liberal Party candidates article which is more than just a listing. 13:56 19 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozzles (talk • contribs)
 * Delete as per nom. RMHED (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 09:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, sometimes, failed candidates are notable for other reasons. Not this person, though, who according to the article is an "administration officer" (paper-shuffler) at a regional university.  Lankiveil (talk) 12:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.