Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Maxwell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 00:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Elizabeth Maxwell

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable voice actress who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. The claim to have won awards seems spurious as I couldn’t find reliable sources substantiating them. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 05:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per proposal Sweetpool50 (talk) 05:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ENTERTAINER as the guideline stated that Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Maxwell has significant role in Attack on Titan, Genshin Impact, Code Geass, RWBY, The Legend of Zelda, and some more. She is also a scheduled speaker in SXSW. Per award, she didn't want any as in the article, but she is nominated in BTVA 2017, and BTVA 2015. SunDawn (talk) 06:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ENTERTAINER. The article as it stands is a bit rough but if fleshed out with all of her major voice acting working she would certainly meet the criteria. PvOberstein (talk)
 * Keep per WP:ENTERTAINER I understand there is not much information on this individual but believe the page is fitting and can be expanded upon in the future. Hawkilloo (talk)
 * Comment Interesting coincidence that three editors (incl. the article creator) suddenly rock up all citing WP:ENTERTAINER. Just saying, nothing more. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability per WP:GNG and per WP:ENTERTAINER standards, by some margin. I guess those award nominations were the reason why this couldn't be speedied, fair enough, but they certainly aren't enough to justify an article. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The article as currently written is weak and needs additional sourcing and justifiable expansion. Having said that, there is no doubt that this individual has distinguished herself in her niche. The frequency and ubiquity of her work suggests ample WP:GNG and it would be a disservice to the community to simply eliminate the article rather than attempt to improve it.Carmelhighlander09 (talk) 07:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.