Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Mclaughlin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 14:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Elizabeth Mclaughlin

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable actress who was in one straight-to-video movie and had a bit part on a single episode of Ugly Betty. WP:ENT requires "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows," etc., which this actress has not had. Contested PROD.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 03:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Two is multiple Rebel1916 (talk) Rebel1916 —Preceding undated comment added 05:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC). — User:Rebel1916 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Even though two is multiple, the Ugly Betty role wasn't significant. JackSlice  Talk   Adds  05:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. One role in a film of questionable notability isn't enough. A guest appearence on a notable show isn't a role. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. JackSlice  Talk   Adds  05:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. It simply isn't notable. We can't include every extra or actor who played minor roles on a television show on Wikipedia. 226Trident (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice towqard recreation once/if her career moves forward. Yes, she has coverage for Ugly Betty and for the film Clique ... but notability is still waiting.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Extremely unnotable actress. Starring in a single direct to DVD film and one bit part is not enough to meet either WP:N nor WP:ENT. Only sourcing and coverage is from a user-edited site and her own website. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 21:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.