Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Merrick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 07:03Z 

Elizabeth Merrick

 * — (View AfD)

I declined a prod on this, last night, since it seemed to at least be better than the other 100+ pages I'd just deleted. I'm not entirely sure whether this particular person would meet WP:BIO. Gets some promising-looking results on Google, and even some hits on Google News (book reviews and such, mostly). So, I figure it can't hurt to ask the community what to do with this one. Thoughts? Luna Santin 21:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - independant coverage, and multiple reviews of her "Chic Lit" book. Chovain 21:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems notable enough and passes WP:BIO as I found a few Google News hits and several reliable sources through Google. Jayden54 22:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Promising is not enough. I don't see a clear proof of notability in the article as it stands. Edison 16:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete -- subject falls just short of notable. -- Dasnedius 18:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree that "promising" isn't enough, but she's already notable enough that readers might want to know about her. JamesMLane t c 19:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.