Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Minchin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep notability established and good sources added (WP:NAC)  C T J F 8 3  chat 06:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Elizabeth Minchin

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Totally unsourced. I even googled for her - http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Elizabeth Hume Minchin%22&aq=f&aql=&aqi=&oq= Hipocrite (talk) 21:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You get much better results without her middle name. Try clicking on the "find sources" links above, particularly the "scholar" and "books" links. Holly25 (talk) 21:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 23:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  --  Bduke    (Discussion)  01:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Carrick awards are notable. She is a full Professor, which is more restricted in Australian academia than the US. The books seem notable and are sourced. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  01:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bduke, WP:HEY, and WP:PROF; it is now well-referenced. Bearian (talk) 02:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, A national-level academic award, a journal editorship, plus multiple published reviews of her books, looks sufficient for passing WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 05:47, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well-sourced, good article. Rebecca (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree, WP:PROF is met here. Robofish (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.