Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Mosier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 03:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Elizabeth Mosier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I would've actually PRODed this if not for the claims of having coverage from notable sources so here we are; the best my searches found were only this and this. SwisterTwister  talk  07:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – nothing of significance which may warrant notability. sst ✈  11:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - While not incredibly common, I was still struck by the number of folks who have this combination in their names when I did my searches. Regarding this particular person, nothing but trivial mentions and some primary sources. Scholar gives her highest quote count at 17. Doesn't pass WP:GNG or any of the niche notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:29, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. A quick Google search shows that this writer has contributed to some key literary publications and that there are indeed more good quality links to support inclusion on WP. She is also signed to major international publisher Random House and has a page on their website. While those not involved in literature and journalism may not know the significance of said work, as a professional in this industry I am very much aware. I will add my findings to the page later on. Given the lacking coverage of journalists and writers on Wikipedia at the moment, I think it's important to have knowledge of the specialist area to judge a page like this, so I hope other literary types might contribute to the discussion. -- delilah_folk 15:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Random House publication is sufficient; agree with . -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 01:24, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There are reviews of her work in School Library Journal, Booklist and Book Report. She's a children's/ya book writer. I'll add sources and fix up article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I cleaned it up and added a few more references. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 01:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.