Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth O. Hiller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Firm consensus after WP:HEY work by RebeccaGreen that notability is satisfied (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 21:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Elizabeth O. Hiller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Still does not assert notability even after leaving it for a month. Author does not wish to discuss the issue. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 06:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added references, including articles dating from 1899 to 1987, about her books, courses, lectures and demonstrations. The article already included sources from 1917-2009. I believe these show that she meets WP:CREATIVE #1 "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." and #3 "The person has created .. a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of ... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." She was clearly regarded as a notable / prominent / leading cook and domestic science lecturer, and her work continued to be reviewed in independent sources (eg the New York Daily News, the Lansing State Journal). RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:02, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per RebeccaGreen. FOARP (talk) 18:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)


 * WP:SNOW KEEP. Article was sufficiently well sourced to indicate notability when Nom nominated it, obviously without a WP:BEFORE.  Thanks to User:RebeccaGreen for WP:HEYMANN sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep There are enough reliable sources on the article that establish notability. MatthewManchester1994 (talk) 23:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep notability is established by the sources.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep That fruited cereal ad "Endorsed! By one of the most famous cooks in America!" is pretty hilarious. It's an ad, so can't really go to prove notability, but certainly it wasn't an absurd argument at the time. Got here from food-related deletion discussions. valereee (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.