Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Roth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Elizabeth Roth

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not pass biography guidelines, specifically she is a local politician who has never held any office higher than board of selectmen (i.e. board of alderman/town council in New England). No other indications of notability Jayron32. talk . contribs 03:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Local politicians are inherently non-notable. Running for the state senate does not necessarily make one notable. No evidence of any significant coverage that elevates the subject's notability. DarkAudit (talk) 04:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Local politicians are absolutely not inherently non-notable. "Not inherently notable" and "inherently not notable" are two very different things. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails politician notability standard:  Qworty (talk) 04:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Person not important enough for wikipedia. Dwilso  04:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As not notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability is the concern..-- Cometstyles 10:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability strikes again. iM at  th ew   20  08  11:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Smalltown political figure is the best claim to fame. Snowball it. -- Auto (talk / contribs) 13:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with Autocracy. PeterSymonds | talk  14:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Too local, not notable enough to make it to Wikipedia. We might as well write articles for ourselves.


 * —— The Unknown Hitchhiker  O  16:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Salem isn't big enough for its municipal politicians to be notable without having done something exceptional. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.