Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Watkins (supercentenarian) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted per G4 I note that the editor suspiciously was able to recreate the exact wording minus the reference from a five year old deletion which is suspicious to say the least. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Elizabeth Watkins (supercentenarian)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreation, by topic-banned editor, or article previously deleted via AfD.  E Eng  21:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Might be able to just speedy it as recreation of material deleted at AfD. Regardless, we certainly don't need an unsourced stub of questionable notability created by someone topic banned from creating said stub. Trivia: This article was created the very same minute as the AE thread was closed with a topic ban. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 21:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Dang, I forgot there's a speedy cat for this.  E Eng  22:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.