Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Weiffenbach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Elizabeth Weiffenbach

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod. There may be another reference but being a Hugh Schoo teacher whose main claim to notability is that she taught several people who have wiki articles does not make her notable. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability despite the WP:INHERITED argument that the article is attempting to make. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The deprodder claimed that WP:SOURCESEXIST, but has not produced them, and I didn't find them.  Notability is not inherited, and the article as stands looks like an A7. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I normally refrain from voting on deletion discussion when the subject is deceased since Wikipedia is overly focused on the living, but this is absurd. High school year books will from time to time give much coverage of teachers, I am guessing even more so in the past, but that is not a source we should use to show notability. Nor is one article in a local paper. The claims that she influenced significantly those of her students who went on the be notable is not really supported by any sourcing. Being a teacher of someone who went on to become notable only rarely is grounds for considering someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed. If someone had been an advisor at a school and supervised someone’s dissertation or say, Pablo Picasso credits someone with encouraging him to be an artist, then MAYBE.  But that isn’t the case here. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 21:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.