Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizaveta Boyarskaya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - This was meant to have been closed ages ago! (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 12:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Elizaveta Boyarskaya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable actress, Unfortunately can't find anything notability-wise, Fails NACTOR & GNG – Davey 2010 Talk 04:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are enough references in Russian, as well as Wikipedia articles in other languages. Reference I've found include this, this , this , this , this and this Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Profiles / move lists don't count towards notability, I think there was one source that was fine but the rest were either movie lists or reviews so I don't notability's there atm. – Davey 2010 Talk 06:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Nope, references 1 and 3 are aggregators of articles about her in respective newspapers and 5 and 6 are articles. There are a lot of articles about her lately in yellow press. It's a kitsch and yellow, but still culture, even being low one. I will add more references later. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * References


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep pretty notable actress, among other things, a major role in The Irony of Fate 2, the highest grossing Russian films for many years, good quality references already there. Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.