Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elk County Catholic High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Elk County Catholic High School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-Notable School: Only 1 Source, Contains Promotional Wording. — PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 03:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose: organisation is referenced by multiple independent sources Jack4576 (talk) 06:15, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 03:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Notability (organizations and companies) says: "All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations, the general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria." Sources     </li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Elk County Catholic High School to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 08:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok so now there is more sources for the article(only five listed on the articles reference list), but the article still does not qualify for a wikipedia article, it is too short & still contains promotional wording. No sources for the "notable alumimi". PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Neither "too short" nor "promotional wording" are reasons for deletion. Deletion is about notability and the availability of sourcing, not about cleanup. See WP:DINC. Interestingly, however, the kind of coverage that's driving the inclusion here would for an athlete or a business organization probably lead to the article being deleted as having only routine coverage. --Jahaza (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

</li></ul>
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Christianity,  and Pennsylvania.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Numerous SIGCOV-providing sources exist, proved by Cunard. should have done a WP:BEFORE first. Timothytyy (talk) 10:55, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is obviously numerous WP:SIGCOV-compliant sources that a quick internet search would have found. Please conduct WP:BEFORE searches before nominating an article for deletion, it wastes time for everyone to have to !vote and find sources for clearly notable topics, this has happened on at least a few AfD's that you have nominated. JML1148 (Talk &#124; Contribs) 11:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Notability is determined by what coverage exists for the subject, not the current state of the article. WP:BEFORE isn't optional. 69.92.163.38 (talk) 14:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The main concern is that this articles wording is promotional. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:SOFIXIT. 69.92.163.38 (talk) 13:58, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 69.92.163.38, I wish BEFORE was required!<span id="Jacona:1683817463619:WikipediaFTTCLNArticles_for_deletion/Elk_County_Catholic_High_School" class="FTTCmt"> — Jacona (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Available sources sufficient for WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.