Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ella Baff

Ella Baff
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nothing that would qualify under the general notability guideline. Lots of problems with inadequate sourcing and WP:NOR. GuardianH (talk) 07:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets notability requirements including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and WP:Basic per available sources Ednabrenze (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Has a lot of sources, and 3 or 4 of those sources passes the WP:DEPTH requirement, seems pretty notable if you ask me.
 * Ferdinand Marcos&#39;s dead (and weird) soul (talk) 07:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Arts.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: A program officer for arts and culture is simply an office job inside the foundation, nothing notable that gets you an article. Sourcing is a mix of PR items and confirmation of appointments to various positions, none of which are notable. Oaktree b (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * She is better known for her work as the executive and artistic director of the Jacob's Pillow dance festival, than for what she did while working at the Mellon Foundation. I am adding in details now. DaffodilOcean (talk) 02:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Oaktree b - I invite you to re-consider the article now that I have made multiple additions and shifted the focus to make it clear that her primary impact is at Jacob's Pillow DaffodilOcean (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: New sources are more about Jacob's Pillow, not about this person. Not really helping prove notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: For others to consider, I think the top three sources about Baff are these (selected because of the extended coverage that spans multiple years): . I further think that she meets WP:CREATIVE for her work with Jacob's Pillow (criteria #4, which in part says "The person's work (or works) has: ... (c) won significant critical attention ..." That being said. I look forward to hearing what others think. DaffodilOcean (talk) 15:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.