Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elledi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 10:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Elledi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom. This was prod tagged and deleted as part of User:Oo7565's random-deletion-tagging spree. This is a verifiable and potentially notable company, so I've undeleted and set up a procedural AFD discussion. Procedural nom, so I abstain. –  iride scent  22:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Weak Keep Widely sold, at least in NYC, so they have international distribution--apparently by the ton: . DGG (talk) 23:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The "Elledi" name appears to be a common last name in several countries, and it is hard to sort out relevant from irrelevant foreign language Google News hits. Granted they export confections, but how does that satisfy WP:N? Edison (talk) 03:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable per WP:CORP, it is a 40 year old publicly traded company and independent references exist. You might compare them to  Lefèvre-Utile Biscuit Co. or Pepperidge Farms (but without bread products) except those companies aren't even publicly traded but owned by food conglomerates, Kraft and Campbell, respectively. Drawn Some (talk) 00:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.