Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellen Lowell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Withdrawn the nomination as the copyright concerns have been clarified and another user has worked and improved the article.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Ellen Lowell

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Prod removed fails WP:N and has copyright issues Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Even when this character lasted for many years, there is no known reception on and significance from this character at all. No real-world scholarly sources are found, no books are found, and no periodicals are found about her. --George Ho (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 09:37, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

 Comment from Musicfreak7676 at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas. --George Ho (talk) 04:18, 29 January 2012 (UTC) "I say ditch because there's little-to-no information, unless someone wishes to clean [it] up and make [it] worth keeping."

- Music Freak 7676 TALK! 17:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Pending - Still don't know why this character is worth keeping, but Raintheone has done a better job than I. Nevertheless, the article needs some work. --George Ho (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - This character was on television sets for 40 years. The series was broadcast around the world. It screams potential. I think that passes GNG and It just needs some work. I've started to add some sources for the basics. The character's longevity means that their is a potential for sources to be found - you just have to do some searching the net, books, archives etc... Rain  the 1  22:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.