Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellie Geranmayeh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Ellie Geranmayeh

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Essentially no coverage in independent secondary sources other than a brief accusation in Turkish press that she was connected to a coup attempt in 2016. Coverage of that incident currently takes up half the article, and should probably be removed per WP:SUSPECT. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBIO, appears to have an h-index under 10 based on Google Scholar results. signed,Rosguill talk 22:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 22:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete not even close to enough sourcing to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not nearly sufficient.  DGG ( talk ) 18:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC) ��
 * Delete. Too little here to pass WP:PROF. The coverage that does exist seem to fall under WP:BIO1E/WP:NOTNEWS. Nsk92 (talk) 11:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure I can add some other information to this page if that would make a difference. The Turkish story is not important for the headline claim (likely false) but for drawing attention to the fact that Geranmeyah was meeting with a bunch of foreign policy experts, some quite highly connected, sharing a broad ideological outlook which includes no love lost for Erdogan (I would bet the room was far more excited than concerned when news of the unfolding coup appeared on their screens). Is Wikipedia not interested in events which bring significant attention to an individual (in this case, at least in Turkey) if those events are reported on with a false context? I'd finally say that despite it being highly unlikely that she and fellow experts were meeting specifically to assist the coup, they could still have been able to assist it once made aware of its scale and ambition. CarlosatUVW (talk) 19:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same bio copied everywhere. I found two books on books.google.com which might be interesting to look at. But they are published by her employer and don't have any in depth coverage either. Palmsandbeaches (talk) 12:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.